Pipeline GurusAli Yousef Task

Conversions

Two funnels, not one. The report counts unique users across 15 months. Notion Conversion Funnel counts monthly events for March–May only. I would not add them together.

930

CTA users

Full window. Clicks, not bookings.

313

Form-start users

28

Form-submit users

Lead proxy. 0.15% of users.

33

Notion contacts Mar–May

73 form starts in those months.

Full-window user path

Active users → CTA users → form-start users → form-submission users. Source: report.
View series as a table
nameUsers
Active users18,435
Consultation CTA users930
Form-start users313
Form-submission users28

What I noticed. 313 starters versus 28 submitters. Largest observable funnel leak.

How I am reading it. Six required fields and duplicate form events can both produce this cliff. I am not sure yet which is doing more of the damage. I would not use the 13,250 key-event total to argue the funnel is healthy.

What I would look at next. I would rebuild the key-event taxonomy and shorten the form before buying more traffic into it.

Notion monthly funnel, March–May 2026

Columns
Conversion Funnel database
March 20261,97379776341202.07%1.01%
April 20261,7166435792061.16%0.30%
May 20267163333071271.60%0.98%

March–May contacts sum to 33. Full-window form-submit users are 28. Contacts look closer to event counts; submit users look like unique people. April contact rate 0.3% is the worst of the three months, and it coincides with Paid Social at 653 sessions and 0 channel contacts. I would like to understand that coincidence better before I spend more on that mix.

These are not the lead numbers I would use

Key events: 13,250. The careers landing page has a 97.5% key-event session rate. This total is in GA4, but I would not take it into a budget conversation as pipeline.

GA4 revenue is £0. HubSpot is installed. Cold To Closed is a course workspace, not an opportunity ledger. I am still missing CRM-sourced pipeline here.

Measurement audit

GA4 implementationProperty transcribed through 16 Sep 2026 via the 17 Sep report. Site Kit + GTM remain on the public HTML.
Key events13,250 events. Careers landing 97.5% key-event session rate. I would rebuild the taxonomy before using this as a commercial number.
Form trackingform_submission and form_submit both exist. 313 starts, 28 submit users. Duplicate taxonomy can diverge.
CTA trackingConsultation CTA: 930 users / 2,378 events. Measures clicks, not appointments.
Calendly / demoNo embed found. No confirmed booking event observed.
LinkedIn attributionPartial Apr–Jun tracker; impressions blank; no public UTM standard.
UTM usageNot documented on-site. Direct likely absorbs untagged social.
Campaign namingPaid Other and Direct obscure sources. Placement-level paid audit still required.
Source/medium consistencyDefault channel group transcribed; campaign/content parameters incomplete.
Cross-domaingtag linker domains include pipelinegurus.com; further domains unknown
Referral exclusionsJanuary 509 referral sessions at 99.2% engagement and 0.79% key-event rate: unverified anomaly.
CRM attributionGA4 revenue £0. No lead IDs. HubSpot plugin present; CRM reports not joined.
Funnel trackingUser counts exist for CTA → form start → submit. Qualified-lead and opportunity stages do not.

Where I would go next

What I noticedThe numbersHow I am reading itWhat I would do next
Two conversion denominators28 submit users vs 33 Notion contacts in three months vs 13,250 key events.I can pick a flattering number unless I freeze the taxonomy. I would rather use 28 submitters.I would not brief the key-event total. I want HubSpot joined before I talk about ROI.

Read the journey narrative